NSFAS Faces Scrutiny After Report Says 40,000 Students Were Improperly Funded
JOHANNESBURG — South Africa’s National Student Financial Aid Scheme is under fresh pressure after a Public Protector investigation found that more than 40,00...

JOHANNESBURG — South Africa’s National Student Financial Aid Scheme is under fresh pressure after a Public Protector investigation found that more than 40,000 students were improperly funded at a cost of about R5.1 billion.
The students were spread across 76 higher education institutions. More than R2 billion has already been recovered, but the findings point to deeper problems inside a system meant to widen access to university education.
Public Protector flags systemic failures
Public Protector Kholeka Gcaleka released a Section 7(9) notice on Tuesday, saying the evidence points to systemic maladministration within NSFAS. Her findings draw on the Special Investigating Unit’s work under Proclamation R88 of 2022, complaints received by her office, meetings with stakeholders and other oversight findings.
Gcaleka said information presented by the Special Investigating Unit to Parliament’s Standing Committee on Public Accounts helped raise alarms about the scheme. The investigation identified more than 40,000 students who had been funded improperly across the 76 institutions.
“The decision to initiate this investigation was further informed by subsequent developments which re-emphasised concerns regarding the governance and administration of NSFAS and the broader higher education funding system,” Gcaleka said.
Why it matters
The scale of the misallocated money matters far beyond NSFAS itself. For students who depend on public support, delays and funding errors can mean missed registration, unstable accommodation and interrupted studies. For the state, the report raises questions about how effectively scarce education funding is being checked before it goes out the door.
The Public Protector’s report also highlighted funding delays, unresolved student queries and governance weaknesses that affected access to higher education. Gcaleka said the wider picture points to failures in administration, governance, funding, co-ordination and oversight.
Those concerns have intensified as NSFAS has faced recurring student protests, funding delays and scrutiny over its management. The scheme has also been placed under administration amid ongoing governance and maladministration worries.
Gcaleka said the findings, along with the recoveries already made and other oversight material, strengthened her view that NSFAS is dealing with serious structural problems. The report lands as the debate over who gets funded — and who should not — remains unresolved.



