JournalArta
Friday, August 28, 2026 · JakartaS&P 7,711.49 ▼0.25%USD/IDR 17,698 ▼0.45%Subscribe
JournalArta
Global Edition
beyond headlines
Advertisement
Asia · South Asia

India regulator proposes red warning labels on packaged foods high in fat, sugar or salt

?s food regulator has moved to put red warning labels on packaged foods that are high in fat, sugar or salt, after weeks of pressure. India — full details here.

By matthew jonathan
August 28, 20262 min read
India regulator proposes red warning labels on packaged foods high in fat, sugar or salt
India regulator proposes red warning labels on packaged foods high in fat, sugar or salt

India’s food regulator has moved to put red warning labels on packaged foods that are high in fat, sugar or salt, after weeks of pressure from the country’s Supreme Court and public health campaigners. The proposal would put a hexagonal alert on the front of packs, making it easier for shoppers to spot products that cross set nutrient thresholds.

What the labels would say

Under the plan filed in a compliance affidavit before the Supreme Court, the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India, or FSSAI, wants front-of-pack warnings for products that are high in any two or more of the nutrients of concern. The labels would carry clear declarations such as “HIGH FAT”, “HIGH SUGAR” and “HIGH SALT”, depending on what exceeds the limits.

The thresholds would follow the Dietary Guidelines for Indians, 2024, issued by the ICMR-National Institute of Nutrition. The idea is simple. A consumer should be able to read the front of a pack and know, at a glance, whether the product is loaded with nutrients linked to diet-related health risks.

Pressure from the court, pushback from industry

The move marks a sharp shift for FSSAI. Just a fortnight earlier, the Supreme Court had questioned the regulator’s reluctance to bring in such warnings, and then asked it to speed up the process in a hearing earlier this month. Health activists have also pressed for stricter front-of-pack labelling, saying existing packaging often hides the nutritional downside of processed food.

Advertisement

Food companies have resisted. Industry groups linked to major brands including Nestle, PepsiCo and Coca-Cola have argued that warning labels are confusing. Their opposition has not stopped the push. In India’s more than $100 billion packaged food market, the proposal lands hard.

Why the change matters beyond India

Front-of-pack warning labels have become a wider public health tool in several markets as governments try to tackle rising obesity and other diet-related illness. The Indian proposal follows the same logic: give shoppers a quick visual cue, not a nutrition lecture buried in the back of the pack.

If adopted, the red hexagon would be one of the most visible warning systems yet used by a major food market. That matters in India, where packaged snacks and drinks have grown into a sprawling everyday business and where regulators are under pressure to make labels clearer, not busier.

The next step is in the court record. FSSAI’s affidavit has put the proposal on official footing, and the Supreme Court will now weigh the regulator’s response after years of debate over how much warning consumers should see before they buy.

Advertisement
Advertisement