Indonesia Lawmakers Urge Caution on Merger of Disaster Agencies
Indonesia's House Speaker Puan Maharani calls for a detailed review before merging the BMKG and the Geological Agency to ensure disaster mitigation safety.

JAKARTA — The speaker of Indonesia's House of Representatives (DPR), Puan Maharani, has formally requested that the government conduct a rigorous assessment of a proposal to merge the Meteorology, Climatology, and Geophysical Agency (BMKG) with the Geological Agency. The push for a merger has gained traction within executive circles, but legislative leaders are raising alarms over potential risks to the nation’s disaster mitigation infrastructure.
During the 26th plenary session of the House, Maharani emphasized that the two institutions possess fundamentally distinct mandates. The BMKG is primarily responsible for weather and climate monitoring, while the Geological Agency is tasked with geological and volcanological surveillance. A consolidation of these specialized entities could, according to Maharani, jeopardize the operational efficacy of Indonesia's early warning systems.
Evaluating Institutional Risks
Indonesia remains one of the world's most disaster-prone nations, situated along the Pacific Ring of Fire and characterized by complex tropical weather patterns. Maharani argued that any reorganization must be meticulously vetted to avoid administrative and technical paralysis. She highlighted that the integration of such vast, specialized bureaucracies would require significant adjustments to organizational governance, human resource allocation, and existing high-tech sensor networks.
"The two institutions perform different functions. The BMKG focuses on weather and climate, while the Geological Agency handles geological and volcanological aspects," Maharani stated during the plenary session.
Prioritizing Public Safety
While the House is generally supportive of government efficiency initiatives, Maharani stressed that institutional streamlining should not come at the cost of public safety. The proposal to merge these agencies was originally discussed as part of a broader government plan for administrative reorganization. However, the legislative branch has signaled its intent to scrutinize the move, given its direct impact on public policy and emergency response capabilities.
Maharani maintained that the government must involve experts from various scientific disciplines before proceeding with any implementation. She reiterated that while administrative efficiency is a legitimate goal, it cannot supersede the reliability of critical disaster mitigation systems. The call for a comprehensive study reflects the legislature's cautious stance toward any structural changes affecting agencies that serve as the front line for national disaster protection.


