Couples in Their Late 70s Face a Plan for Care and Trust
A couple in their late 70s with no children are considering how to arrange help as they age, including who could manage health and financial decisions. A…

A married couple in their late 70s with no children are considering how to arrange care and legal decision-making as they age, after finding no trusted person to appoint as an attorney. The couple, who have been married for more than 40 years, are both reasonably healthy but worry about losing their independence.
Their relatives live far away or cannot provide support, while friends are of a similar age and managing their own challenges. The couple’s concern highlights a practical question for older people without nearby family: who can help with health and financial affairs if they can no longer manage them alone?
The husband said they had been a self-reliant unit and were increasingly aware that they would eventually need help. He and his wife had also considered making a lasting power of attorney, but did not know whom they could trust with the responsibility.
Who can be appointed as an attorney?
Estate planning solicitor Gary Rycroft said a person can appoint any number of attorneys. Naming more than one may prevent a single person from holding all the authority, and many people appoint up to four.
Rycroft suggested the couple could initially appoint each other. Although they worry that both might need help at the same time, he said that is often not the case. Appointing a spouse also gives that person “enhanced status” beyond their position as a husband or wife.
A lasting power of attorney covers serious decisions. There are two types: one for health and one for finances. The choice of attorney therefore involves more than finding someone willing to help; the person must be trusted with decisions that affect a partner’s care or money.
The couple could also appoint a professional, such as a solicitor, who would charge for the work. If they later found another person they trusted but did not want to make that person the sole attorney, the professional could act alongside them. Rycroft said the arrangement is complicated and needs specialist legal input.
Planning for practical and emotional needs
Andrew Balfour, a psychoanalytic psychotherapist and chief executive of Tavistock Relationships, said the couple’s concern reflected a wider anxiety about ageing and losing autonomy. He described their letter as “a very poignant expression of how we might all feel about getting older and losing autonomy and the independence of youth”.
Balfour also noted that later-life challenges can bring earlier losses back into focus. The couple had hoped to have children and experienced failed IVF, a history that may intensify their feelings about facing old age without adult children.
He suggested connecting with other people at a similar stage of life, not necessarily to find a future attorney but to feel less isolated. That could address an emotional need alongside the legal and practical work of planning.
Separating current needs from possible future ones may help the couple decide what arrangements to make. Their concern is not only about who can sign documents, but how to preserve a sense of control as their circumstances change.
Age UK offers a downloadable LifeBook for recording personal affairs. The Alzheimer’s Society provides a This Is Me form for personal information, while Macmillan has advice on making a living will.
Rycroft’s central practical option is already available to the couple: they can appoint each other first, then consider adding a solicitor or another trusted person if circumstances allow.



