Friday, 26 June 2026 WIB
BREAKING
SPORTS

McLaren Appeal Over Monaco GP Result, Says Oscar Piastri

Ilustrasi jalur pit lane sirkuit Formula 1 yang menjadi pusat sengketa banding McLaren
McLaren and Red Bull have formally appealed to the FIA International Court of Appeal over the Monaco GP result. Oscar Piastri warned that restoring Pierre Gasly’s podium could set a bad precedent for Formula 1.

MONACO — The fight for the Monaco GP podium has moved from the Monte Carlo street circuit to a courtroom in Paris. McLaren driver Oscar Piastri has now explained why his team formally appealed the result of the Monaco GP. The legal move came after the FIA overturned Alpine driver Pierre Gasly’s penalty and restored him to third place.

The McLaren move marks a new chapter in the political battles behind Formula 1’s wheel-to-wheel action. This is not just about a plastic trophy. It goes to the heart of how the sport’s most prestigious series handles fairness, penalties, and final results.

McLaren is not alone in the case. Red Bull Racing has also filed a similar protest with the FIA International Court of Appeal, the highest judicial body in motorsport. According to Sky Sports, the confusion started with a serious error in measuring pit lane speed on the Monte Carlo street circuit. That mistake triggered a domino effect that hurt several front-runners.

A dangerous precedent for Formula 1

Earlier this month, Alpine won its appeal after proving that the pit lane length in Monaco had not been measured correctly by the organizers. As a result, FIA speed-monitoring equipment produced inaccurate data. Gasly, who had initially dropped to seventh because of an additional 10-second penalty, was restored to third place.

The decision pushed other drivers down the order. Isack Hadjar of Red Bull fell to fourth, Oscar Piastri slipped to fifth, followed by the Racing Bulls pair Liam Lawson and Arvid Lindblad in sixth and seventh. The changes mattered a great deal because points are hard to earn in Monaco, where passing opportunities are scarce. Piastri said the situation has raised serious concerns about how penalties will be handled in the future.

“I’ve never seen a race with so many pit lane speeding penalties. In my case, I was very confident I had not exceeded the speed limit,” Piastri said ahead of the Austrian Grand Prix weekend.

The Australian explained that drivers normally accept the race stewards’ decision on the spot so the event can continue smoothly. But Alpine’s success in changing the result after the race has, in his view, weakened that system. What once felt final now appears open to negotiation.

“The biggest risk we face now is that every time a team or driver thinks their penalty was wrong, they will go through this long process. As a result, we won’t know the official race result even a month later,” Piastri added.

Tactical dilemma on track

The issue becomes more complicated because the drivers faced different circumstances during the race. Piastri, George Russell, and Lewis Hamilton all chose to pit while the Safety Car was out so they could serve their penalties immediately. They did so to comply with the rules under the threat of disqualification or a harsher penalty.

Gasly, by contrast, did not come into the pits to serve his penalty, so he initially received a time penalty after the race instead. That difference in approach left other teams feeling strategically disadvantaged. The teams that followed the rules lost track position after giving up time in the pit lane.

“This is not at all a personal issue with Pierre or Alpine. But if we had known the true situation on track at the time, we would have made a different tactical decision during the race,” said the McLaren driver, who races with car number 81.

Risk of exploiting the rules

On the other side, Pierre Gasly believes the FIA was right to correct a system error. In his view, if a technical mistake hurts a driver without any actual rule breach, the result should be fixed in the name of sporting fairness. The Frenchman argued that he was not at fault for the circuit infrastructure failure.

Even so, Piastri warned that the ruling could open the door to new tactical loopholes in the future. Teams may choose to ignore penalties during the race and then challenge them later in court after the chequered flag.

If that trend continues, constructor standings worth millions of dollars could keep shifting for weeks after a race ends. That would be a headache for broadcasters, sponsors, and fans who want certainty at the finish line.

FIA has not yet announced an official hearing date for the Monaco GP appeal in Paris, France. A final decision is expected in the coming weeks, just as Formula 1 enters a busy run of European summer races.

(FI)

📲
Follow JournalArta News on Telegram

Dapatkan berita terbaru Bangka Belitung & nasional langsung di Telegram Anda. Gratis, no spam.

💬 Follow @journalartanews →
Share: Facebook Twitter Telegram

More For You